Timeline for Possible merger with Computational Sciences?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2014 at 14:24 | comment | added | hardmath Mod | Note the timescale for "real world" computational methods questions may be longer than for "real world" general programming questions. There is some low-hanging fruit in ocean modeling, but one quickly gets (forgive the pun) in over ones head. | |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 22:29 | comment | added | Geoff Oxberry Mod | Yes, I agree; if many ocean modeling-specific questions are asked and go unanswered, that also starts to become a problem. We already get a fair number of unanswered questions (85% answer rate right now), and I'm starting to think that might have to do with poor question quality, too, which might be skewing my impression. Perhaps some Spring cleaning is in order... | |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 22:24 | comment | added | ZZZ | I'd vote your answer up if I had enough points. :) These are along with I have been thinking so far. Regarding the last part of your answer, I feel like most of the questions will NOT be given a general explanation while asking. And if our group does not have somebody to answer those questions it will be unlikely to get an answer from the rest. In that case I see that it might be a problem for CS if there are too many unanswered questions. Is there any other aspect of it that I can't see it now? I agree with you 100%, and hope that both communities will help decide with their votes. | |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 22:09 | vote | accept | ZZZ | ||
| Mar 17, 2014 at 22:08 | vote | accept | ZZZ | ||
| Mar 17, 2014 at 22:08 | |||||
| Mar 17, 2014 at 21:26 | history | answered | Geoff OxberryMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |